Healthcare Application Testing

Perhaps the biggest reason why it is a good idea to load test your critical healthcare applications is that you avoid the high costs associated with applications that do not perform the way that their users expect them to perform. When an application runs slowly or does not perform the tasks it needs to perform, that puts an enormous costs on your company. Load testing helps you prevent this kind of scenario from occurring.

Load testing does have a negative reputation among healthcare companies. It is seen as being too expensive, too time-consuming and not practical in its application. This is not how load testing has to be. In this article, you will learn about the five things that you need to know before you load test your healthcare applications. Knowing these five things will prevent you from wasting time and money in load tests that do not give you the results that you need.

Indeed, if you know these five things, load testing will be exactly what it should be: an efficient way to judge whether or not your application is truly ready to be launched.

1. You want to test from the end user’s point of view.

The most valuable data that you can get from a load test is when a load test is performed from the end users point of view. Ideally this simulates what the end-user will actually be experiencing when using the application under different loads. The data that is produced from a load test from the end-user’s point of view can help you quickly identify bottlenecks in the application, which you can use to better prepare the application for a successful launch.

2. Traditional Load Testers Are Expensive, Slow and Difficult

The reason why load testing has a negative reputation is that traditional load testers are indeed expensive, slow and difficult to set up and run. Traditional load testers have high upfront costs and sometimes even higher backend costs once consulting and labor fees are taken into account. Some of them can take weeks-even months-to set up and execute.

3. Traditional Load Testers Are Not Protocol Independent

Depending on the protocols that run your healthcare applications, choosing a traditional load tester that will actually work on your protocols is challenging. If you run different applications on different systems, then you will need to purchase traditional load testers for each application. This only adds to the cost of load testing over time.

4. Planning is Important

If your load testing team determines beforehand the kinds of loads that it wishes to test for along with what good and bad data would look like, then you can execute the test more efficiently. This will ultimately save you both time and money.

5. You Should Test For Higher Than Anticipated Loads

While it is important to test for the expected amount of stress that your application will be under when it is launched, you can get the most out of your load testing by also testing for stress that is greater than what you anticipate. Regardless of how good your estimates are, you never know what you will get after you actually launch the application.

As you can see, the load tester that you select is very important. Load testing can be a burden if you select the wrong load tester. Traditional load testers have many problems, so you should definitely look into alternatives.

An excellent alternative to traditional load testers is AppLoader. AppLoader is cost-effective, efficient, and effective. Unlike traditional load testers, AppLoader is protocol independent and tests from the end-user’s point of view. It is easy to set up and execute, which means that you can perform multiple load tests using that one piece of software. Because it is protocol and dependent, it is the only load tester that you will ever need to invest in.

With AppLoader, you will get useful data quickly and without difficulty. It is the best load tester for healthcare companies on the market today.